Platform & Organizational Stress Test

The system isn’t breaking.
The organization around it is drifting.

Most failures don’t come from scale alone. They emerge when systems, teams, and decision structures evolve out of sync—when ownership is unclear, boundaries blur, and the platform no longer reflects how the organization actually operates.

I identify where alignment breaks down—across architecture, ownership, and decision-making— before it shows up as reliability issues, delivery drag, or governance risk.

For teams scaling into complexity, not starting from zero.


See how I evaluate systems
Entry Points
01
Platform Stress Test

A focused diagnostic for systems that are working, but no longer holding cleanly under growth. I identify where architecture, ownership, and decision-making have drifted out of alignment— where boundaries blur, responsibilities fragment, and system behavior no longer matches how the organization operates.

The output highlights where this misalignment will compound into reliability issues, delivery drag, or governance risk if left unaddressed.

$10k–$20k · 10–14 days
02
Technical Due Diligence

Independent assessment for investors, acquirers, or operators who need to understand whether a system, product, or technical narrative actually holds up.

I evaluate structural risk across both system design and organizational reality—whether ownership, decision-making, and execution capacity support what is being claimed.

$10k+ · timeline-dependent
How I evaluate systems
Step 1
System & Organizational Intake

Rapid intake across architecture, product claims, ownership boundaries, and decision structures. This includes reviewing documentation, system behavior, and how teams actually operate in practice.

Step 2
Where alignment breaks

I map where the system, teams, and decision-making are out of sync—where assumptions break, responsibilities overlap, or authority is unclear.

This surfaces the specific points where the current structure will fail under scale, coordination pressure, identity complexity, regulatory scrutiny, or AI-layered execution.

Step 3
Findings & Correction Paths

You receive a structured assessment with concrete findings, architectural implications, and recommended correction paths.

The output is designed to support real decisions: hire, restructure, redefine ownership, redesign system boundaries, or proceed with clear tradeoffs.

Systems and organizations rarely fail all at once.
They drift out of alignment until something forces the issue.

Take a closer look at your system me@andrewphunter.com → A short conversation to understand where things may be drifting.